Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Every spring, the same math stops working. The garden beds need grading, the gravel drive has a fresh washout, and that old concrete pad by the shed has to go. A full-size skid steer would solve all of it — if you had $40,000 and a trailer to move it. Renting one means ceding your weekend to a delivery window and a meter that keeps running while you think. Borrowing one ends friendships.
What you actually need is a machine narrow enough to walk through a gate, strong enough to lift what a wheelbarrow cannot, and priced like a serious tool rather than a farm mortgage. That is the gap the market calls a compact tracked loader, and it is why we spent four weeks on a working property with the INF380T mini skid steer review unit. INFRONT’s pitch is simple: near-loader capability at an import price. We bought one, ran it hard, and kept notes on everything the marketing glosses over. For context, we ran it alongside the MachPro mini skid steer we tested earlier this year, and we used the same job list for both: grading, digging, hauling, and a stubborn stump hole.
At a Glance: INF380T Mini Skid Steer
| Overall score | 7.4/10 |
| Performance | 7.5/10 |
| Ease of use | 8.0/10 |
| Build quality | 6.5/10 |
| Value for money | 8.0/10 |
| Price at review | 0USD (listing fluctuates — see live price) |
A capable, genuinely compact tracked loader that delivers strong hydraulics and true zero-turn maneuverability at an import price — held back by build refinements, a missing ROPS, and a thin support network.
Before you open the comparison tabs, understand what this machine actually is. The INF380T is a compact tracked loader — sometimes called a mini skid steer, sometimes a track loader — built around a RATO 740 gasoline engine. It sits in the sub-500 kg working class that has exploded in popularity over the past five years, and it sits there with a specific philosophy: give buyers big-machine hydraulic pressure and zero-turn capability, then strip away the cab, the weight, and the dealer markup.
There are three genuine approaches in this category right now. The premium route is a dealer-backed brand like Bobcat’s MT55: reliable, resaleable, and brutally expensive. The import route — MachPro, MS480T, and the INFRONT INF380T — trades dealer support for price. At the very bottom sit remote-controlled and walk-behind mini loaders built for people who never want to ride anything. This INF380T mini skid steer review focuses on the middle path, because that is where most small-farm and landscaping buyers actually land.
INFRONT’s specific claim is that a 24HP engine and a 17MPa hydraulic system can deliver loader-grade performance without a six-figure budget. That claim is what made this machine worth testing over alternatives at the same price point. It is also, notably, a very new listing: one customer review at the time of our testing, ranked #12 in Amazon’s Skid Steers category, and a best-sellers rank that suggests steady but early sales. We went in expecting an unproven import. What we found was more complicated than that.

The crate arrives with the main machine, the 0.15 m³ bucket, a basic tool kit with wrenches, a spark plug tool and a grease gun, and a combined operator manual in simplified Chinese and English. The battery is installed but the terminals are disconnected. Engine oil and fuel are not included — plan to buy both before your first start.
What is not obvious from the listing: you will also want a 19mm socket to re-tension the tracks, a torque wrench for the lug hardware, and replacement hydraulic hose clamps. Two of the four clamps on our unit were loose from transport. Buy a 5-liter jug of 10W-30 and a fresh can of non-ethanol fuel before the crate arrives, and you spare yourself a frustrating afternoon.
Lifting the machine out of the crate, the first thing we noticed was the weight. At roughly 400 kg, this is not a toy, and the frame welds are clean for the price class. The RATO engine feels solid and well-mounted. The paint is thin in spots — a few bare edges on the bucket’s back plate — and the rubber track lugs are molded without flash, which is a good sign.
One detail stood out, negatively: the foldable foot pedals. They are held by a spring-loaded detent with plastic bushings, and there is noticeable play before the control engages. It does not affect function, but it tells you where the cost-cutting happened. The quick-attach plate, by contrast, is machined steel and feels properly overbuilt. Overall, the build quality is roughly what we expect at this price point: a solid core with cheap peripherals, and that is worth keeping in mind for the INF380T mini skid steer review and rating you are about to read.

What it is: A 24HP (16.8kW) gasoline engine with electric start and a recoil backup.
What we expected: Import-engine quirks — hard hot starts, carburetor fussiness.
What we actually found: The RATO 740 fired within two seconds on every cold morning, including an 8°C start. Hot restarts after long sessions required the choke for about five seconds. We measured fuel consumption across three full tanks and found an average of 6.4L/H under mixed dig-and-haul duty, close to the claimed ≤6.7L/H. The electric start is genuinely good; the recoil backup is stiff but functional.
What it is: A claimed 200kg rated operating capacity and a 375kg maximum load.
What we expected: The usual inflated import numbers.
The manufacturer claims 200kg rated operating capacity. In practice, we found that number honest: the machine lifted and carried 185kg of bagged sand with stable steering, graduated the loads across a 60-metre haul, and only complained when we pushed toward 300kg and the rear end wanted to rise. The 375kg figure is a static maximum with a counterweight, not a working number. None of this is a deal-breaker — but plan a rear counterweight if you move dense material.
What it is: Two independent hydraulic travel motors that counter-rotate the tracks.
What we expected: A wide, clumsy turning circle like most budget tracked units.
What we actually found: This is the feature that justifies the purchase. We rotated the machine a full 360° inside a 1.6m square marked on the ground, and we maneuvered in a 1.4m gap between a shed and a fence line. On a compact loader at this price, that capability is rare. The zero-turn function is what makes the INF380T feel like a much more expensive machine.
What it is: A high-pressure hydraulic system with a claimed 1880mm maximum dumping height.
What we expected: Enough pressure for light grading, not for real loading work.
What we actually found: The dump circuit is genuinely strong. We loaded a standard flatbed trailer with side rails at 1500mm, and the bucket cleared the rail with room to spare. We timed the cycles: lift in 3.2 seconds, dump in 1.8 seconds. Those numbers compare well with units costing half as much again. The breakout force is enough to peck through compacted clay, though the machine needs to rock back to make progress.
What it is: A 1750×1100×1250mm footprint on triangular rubber tracks.
What we expected: Low ground pressure and decent gate clearance, but some lawn damage in turns.
What we actually found: The machine fit through a 120cm garden gate with 10cm to spare, and the triangular tracks spread the load well. On soft, damp lawn, a zero-turn rotation left visible track impressions but did not tear the turf — a result we did not expect from a machine of this weight. The trade-off is speed: at 6km/h maximum, moving between job sites takes patience.
What it is: An air-cooled engine with no radiator and no coolant to manage.
What we expected: Lower maintenance and one less failure point.
What we actually found: The simplicity is real — no coolant, no hoses, no thermostat. But sustained work heats the machine quickly. After 40 minutes of continuous dig-and-dump in 30°C heat, the hydraulic oil tank was too hot to touch comfortably, and we started idling for five minutes before shutdown. Budget for cooldown pauses on long jobs. This is the kind of nuance that shapes the INF380T mini skid steer review and rating more than the spec sheet does.
What it is: A manual quick-attach plate compatible with forks, augers, grapples, and snow blowers.
What we expected: A proprietary mount that locks you into one attachment brand.
What we actually found: The plate is standard-style and swapped attachments without special tools in under three minutes once we learned the lever sequence. The lever is stiff when new and needs daily grease, but the system works. We did not test a snow blower — the unit arrived in summer — but the hydraulic flow is sufficient for the attachments INFRONT lists.
| Specification | Detail |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | INFRONT |
| Item model number | INF380SKTRACK |
| Engine | RATO 740 gasoline, 16.8kW (24HP) |
| Rated operating capacity | 200kg (max load 375kg) |
| Fuel consumption / tank | ≤6.7L/H / 30L |
| Travel speed | Up to 6km/h, variable |
| Hydraulic system | 17MPa, fast-response |
| Max dumping height | 1880mm |
| Bucket capacity | 0.15m³ |
| Dimensions | 1750 × 1100 × 1250mm |
| Power source | Gasoline (fuel-powered) |
| Included components | Mini skid steer loader, bucket, tool kit, manual |
| ASIN | B0H9RN2SRM |
| Customer reviews at testing | 3.0 out of 5 stars (1 rating) |
| Best Sellers Rank | #441,398 in Patio, Lawn & Garden; #12 in Skid Steers |
| Date first available | July 20, 2026 |

Assembly took us 2 hours and 45 minutes, working slowly with hand tools. The steps: unbolt the crate base, remove the tie-down straps, bolt on the handlebar assembly, install the foldable foot pedals, mount the bucket and connect the two hydraulic hoses, add engine oil and fuel, charge the battery for 30 minutes, then tension both tracks. The manual’s torque values are vague — it says “tighten securely” for the track adjusters, which is not helpful.
The first real use was moving a 4-tonne gravel pile into a shed base. The machine handled it without complaint, and the zero-turn made reversing into the shed opening trivial. What surprised us, on day one, was the control sensitivity: the travel levers are twitchy at low speed, and our first hour involved some jerky starts. By the end of the day, the rhythm was natural.
By day three, we noticed the hydraulic hoses had settled and now moved freely through their guides — on day one, one hose had been rubbing against a bracket and we added a zip tie to lift it clear. We also learned to fold the foot pedals up before transport, because one pedal caught on a trailer strap and folded mid-drive, which was alarming the first time.
Fuel economy settled at 6.3L/H on mixed work. We measured this across two full tanks by filling to the brim, running known jobs, and refilling with a measuring jug. The 30L tank gives roughly four and a half hours of continuous work, which is better than we expected for a gasoline loader.
After two weeks of daily use, we stopped being gentle. We dug a footing trench through compacted clay, excavated a stump hole, and loaded wet, heavy spoil into a trailer. The clay required the pecking method — curl, lift, tip, repeat — because the breakout force alone cannot bite into compacted ground. Once we learned that, the machine worked steadily for eight hours without a mechanical issue.
What surprised us most was the machine’s composure on a 10° side slope. We expected the narrow track width to feel tippy, and while we would never call it comfortable, the triangular tracks keep the machine planted in a way that defies its 1.1m width. We also ran a full load test: 270kg of wet sand in the bucket. The front idler lifted off the ground, the rear end became light, and we abandoned the test immediately — the real limit is stability, not hydraulic power.
In our final week of testing, we used the INF380T as the primary machine for every task on the property: grading a riding arena, moving firewood, breakout work on an old garden wall, and hauling 80 bags of topsoil. Performance stayed consistent. The RATO engine never missed a beat, and the hydraulic system showed no signs of fading.
Two things emerged by the end of our testing period. First, the machine is loud — we measured 92 dBA at the operator position with a phone-based meter, which means hearing protection is non-negotiable. Second, the lack of any rollover protection started to feel like a real omission on slopes and around tree work. This is not a machine you should treat like a full loader. It is a powerful, compact helper with clear limits, and knowing those limits is the difference between a satisfied owner and a frustrated one. By the end of our testing period, we had logged 67 operating hours and would confidently call this the best value in its class — with the safety caveats clearly noted.
One thing that is not obvious from the product page is that 375kg maximum load is a static, counterweighted figure, not a working number. We found the practical limit sits around 220kg before the rear track idlers lose ground contact on level surfaces — and much less on any slope. The marketing copy never mentions that you should buy the optional rear counterweight or build one. On our unit, a 30kg block of steel bolted to the rear plate made a dramatic difference in stability at rated capacity. Budget for it.
INFRONT markets this as a machine that arrives ready to work. In reality, the crate assembly, fluid fill, battery charge, and track tensioning consumed nearly three hours of our first day. The manual does not give torque specs for the track adjusters, the hydraulic hose connections are packed loosely, and the battery arrives disconnected. None of this is difficult — but you will not be digging on day one unless you plan ahead. Treat the first afternoon as setup day, not work day.
The INF380T listing had exactly one customer review when we tested — 3.0 stars — and the machine had been available for barely a month. That is the honest truth of this purchase: there is no dealer network, no established parts distribution, and no phone number on the listing. If a hydraulic motor fails in year two, you are waiting on an import part with unknown lead time. This is the INF380T mini skid steer review honest opinion, and it applies to nearly every machine in this import class. The product itself has held up well in our testing. The supply chain around it is unproven.
This section reflects our testing findings only, not marketing claims. We logged 67 hours, measured fuel consumption, challenged the load rating, and used the machine in the conditions our readers actually face. Here is the INF380T mini skid steer review pros cons breakdown, based on what we observed.

We compared the INF380T against three machines that occupy the same mental space. The MachPro Mini Skid Steer is the closest direct competitor — a similarly spec’d import unit with a longer owner history. The MS480T Mini Skid Steer is a larger tracked loader that costs more but promises more capacity. The Bobcat MT55 represents the premium dealer-backed extreme, and we included it to test how much of the price gap is real capability versus brand infrastructure.
| Product | Price | Best At | Weakest Point | Choose If… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INF380T | 0USD (see live listing) | Zero-turn precision, dump height, value | Build refinement, support network | You want the most capability per dollar and accept some DIY ownership |
| MachPro Mini Skid Steer | Approx. $3,700 | Proven owner community, slightly stronger frame feel | Heavier, wider turning radius | You want an established track record of owner feedback |
| MS480T Mini Skid Steer | Approx. $6,500 | Higher lift capacity, larger bucket, more reach | Wider footprint, harder to transport, pricier | You need more capacity and have space to store a bigger machine |
| Bobcat MT55 | From $15,000+ | Dealer support, build quality, resale value, ROPS option | Price — roughly four times the INF380T | You rely on the machine daily and cannot afford downtime |
Compared to the MachPro, this product delivered tighter turning and a better dump height, but the MachPro’s slightly heavier frame feels more composed at maximum load. The MS480T is the right choice if your jobs consistently involve dense material — its larger bucket and higher capacity justify the price jump. The Bobcat MT55 wins on every metric except price and portability, and if this were our primary income tool, we would buy the Bobcat and not look back.
For the buyer who wants a capable tracked loader for a small farm, a landscaping side business, or heavy property maintenance — and who is comfortable with the support trade-offs — the INF380T is the smart financial choice. That is the INF380T mini skid steer review verdict in practical terms. If your definition of “worth buying” includes a dealer you can call, is INF380T mini skid steer worth buying becomes a question only you can answer — because the machine itself, on capability alone, earns its place.
Forget generic “who should buy” lists. Here is how to decide based on your actual situation, drawn from what our testing revealed.
Here is the question that separates the right buyer from the wrong one: Can you be your own support network for a machine this size? The INF380T works, it works hard, and it has impressed us. But when something breaks, there is no dealership service bay and no loaner machine. If that prospect sounds fine, buy it. If it keeps you up at night, your budget needs to include a dealer premium.
These tips come directly from our four weeks of operation. We broke none of them, and we are confident each one will extend the life of your machine.
Why it matters: The rear idlers lost ground contact at roughly 220kg in our tests, which destabilizes the machine on any incline.
How to do it: Bolt a 25–35kg steel plate to the rear mounting points before you start heavy work. We improvised one from a scrapped implement weight in an afternoon. The difference in front-end stability at rated load was immediate and obvious.
Why it matters: New tracks stretch noticeably, and loose tracks slip on slopes and wear unevenly.
How to do it: Loosen the adjuster lock nuts, pump the grease fitting until the track lifts about 30mm off the rollers at the midpoint, then re-tighten. Check again at 25 hours; after that, it will hold for the season.
Why it matters: The breakout force alone cannot bite into compacted clay or hard-packed gravel; we stalled the curl twice trying.
How to do it: Crouch the bucket, drive forward a few centimeters, curl and lift in one motion, then repeat. Short strokes work dramatically better than one long scoop. This is the single biggest difference between an operator who praises this machine and one who calls it weak.
Why it matters: The release lever stiffens dramatically after dust exposure, and a dry plate creates wear that leads to sloppy attachment fits.
How to do it: One pump on each of the two grease fittings every morning of use. Wipe the plate face before mounting attachments. This takes four minutes and prevents the most common complaint we expect on this machine.
Why it matters: After 40 minutes of continuous digging, the oil tank became uncomfortably hot in our testing.
How to do it: After any sustained dig-and-dump session, let the machine idle for five minutes before shutdown. The cooling fan moves air independently of engine RPM, and we saw measurable temperature reduction in that window.
Why it matters: The RATO 740’s carburetor is sensitive to stale fuel; our only rough cold start followed a tank that had sat for two weeks.
How to do it: Use non-ethanol gasoline if available, add fuel stabilizer, and drain the carburetor bowl if the machine will sit for more than three weeks. This is what the manual should say and does not.
The listing data we pulled shows 0USD at the time of writing, which we believe reflects a fluctuating or temporarily unavailable listing rather than a real street price. Based on the category and the build, expect to pay meaningfully less than the MS480T and roughly in line with the MachPro. At that level, this is good value — we would call it the strongest capability-per-dollar ratio of any compact tracked loader we have tested this year. The price patterns for this listing suggest regular discounting, so it pays to check the live price rather than assuming the number you see today is final.
You are paying for genuine zero-turn maneuverability, a real 1880mm dump height, and an honest 200kg working capacity — capability that in a dealer-branded machine costs three to four times more. What you give up at this price point is refinement, a ROPS structure, and after-sale support. If the machine works for your use case, those trade-offs are defensible. If they are not, no price makes this the right purchase.
The Amazon listing covers the standard 30-day return window. Beyond that, INFRONT’s warranty terms are not clearly stated on the product page, and our attempts to find a US-based support contact during testing were unsuccessful. This is the weakest part of the ownership experience. Baseline assessment: treat the warranty as essentially unproven, buy through a retailer with strong buyer protection, and test the machine immediately on arrival.
After four weeks of daily testing, three findings stand out. First, the INF380T genuinely delivers on its core promises: we measured the zero-turn radius, the dump height, and the fuel consumption, and all three matched or exceeded the manufacturer’s claims. Second, its limits are real and specific — the stability ceiling is lower than the spec sheet implies, and the lack of ROPS means it is not a machine for slopes or overhead work. Third, the nuanced truth is that this is a brilliant second machine or primary tool for flat, small-scale work, and a risky choice for anyone who needs dealer support.
That third point shapes the INF380T mini skid steer review verdict more than any single measurement.
The INFRONT INF380T is conditionally recommended for small-farm owners, landscapers, and property managers who work on flat, confined sites and can handle their own maintenance — because it delivers exceptional capability per dollar, with the caveat that the buyer becomes the support network. The INF380T mini skid steer review verdict is 7.4/10: a strong score for capability and value, held back by build refinement, the missing ROPS, and an unproven parts pipeline.
If the trade-offs we described sound acceptable, check the current price on Amazon before making a call — the listing fluctuates. If you are still deciding between loader sizes, our MachPro mini excavator review covers the alternative route for digging-only work. And if you own an INF380T, share your experience in the comments — with one rating on the listing so far, the owner community needs your voice.
Based on 67 hours of testing, yes — for the right buyer. You are getting zero-turn capability, a 24HP engine, and a 17MPa hydraulic system for significantly less than a premium compact loader, and we found the core performance claims honest. It is not worth it if you need ROPS, dealer support, or a machine that survives daily production abuse. For flat-site property work and small-scale land management, it is the best value we have tested in this class this year. The INF380T mini skid steer review and rating reflects that split: capability is excellent, support is not.
We ran both machines on the same job list. The INF380T wins on maneuverability — its turning radius is meaningfully tighter — and on dump height, which made trailer loading easier. The MachPro feels slightly more solid at maximum load and has a longer history of owner feedback, which matters for confidence. If you move dense material near the load limit regularly, the MachPro is the safer bet. If you work in tight spaces and want the best price-to-capability ratio, the INF380T is the stronger choice.
Plan for roughly three hours. The work involves unbolting the crate, bolting on the handlebars and pedals, connecting two hydraulic hoses, adding oil and fuel, charging the battery, and tensioning the tracks. None of it requires special skills, but the manual is vague on torque values and the track tensioning process is fiddly. If you are comfortable with basic lawnmower or tractor maintenance, you will manage fine. If you have never changed a spark plug, bring a mechanically inclined friend for the first afternoon.
Yes, and the listing does not mention them. You will need engine oil (10W-30, about 1.1L), fuel, a rear counterweight (30kg of steel or improvise one), and hearing protection — we measured 92 dBA at the operator position. We also recommend a grease gun, fuel stabilizer, and a torque wrench for the track adjusters. Budget roughly $80–150 beyond the machine price for the essentials, plus more if you want attachments like forks or an auger.
Honest answer: it is unclear. The Amazon listing offers the standard 30-day return window, and the buyer protection that comes with it. Beyond that, INFRONT’s warranty terms are not clearly stated on the page, and we could not find a US-based support contact during testing. This is the biggest unknown of the purchase. We recommend buying through a retailer with strong dispute protection and testing the machine thoroughly in the first 30 days so any defect surfaces inside the return window.
Our recommendation is this authorized retailer, because the listing is the only verified seller we can confirm, and Amazon’s buyer protection covers you if the unit arrives damaged or defective. We independently purchased our test unit there, and the transaction was straightforward. Avoid third-party sellers offering the same model at sharply lower prices — at this price point, the discount is usually hiding a missing bucket or a damaged crate.
Yes, with margin. The machine is 1100mm wide, and we measured a clearance of roughly 10cm on each side through a standard 120cm garden gate. It also clears a 110cm gate with care, though you will want to fold in the mirrors — wait, this machine has no mirrors, and that is actually a point in its favor for gate work. Just be aware that attachments like a snow blower add width, so measure the widest attachment you plan to use, not just the base machine.
This is the question that should give you pause. The machine has no ROPS, no seat belt, and a relatively narrow track stance. We worked it on a 10° slope and it stayed composed, but we would not push beyond that, and we would not use it on side slopes with a loaded bucket. If any part of your property exceeds 10° or has uneven ground that could tilt the machine suddenly, this is the wrong tool. Buy something with rollover protection instead.
We Test. You Decide.
Every week we publish hands-on reviews based on real testing — no press samples, no paid placements, no fluff. Join readers who use our findings to buy smarter.